You've already forked mi-apmainas-parvaldiba
Import UAPF package
64ecc3f48d
BPMN admission (AL0 -> AL2), four DMN decision tables and a CMMN case for suspension, withdrawal and appeal. The three rules that answer structural objections structurally: - 17.2 circularity is a precondition, not a warning (avota-neatkariba). A participant cannot be the source of its own admission evidence, including where it commercially supplies company-register data. - 15 adverse decisions fail closed: exhaustive grounds, 30-day notice, cure, 5-working-day emergency review, two distinct officers, conflict-free appeal. - 6.4 a legally significant answer is never T0. Not an AI system (Reg. (EU) 2024/1689 Art. 3(1), Recital 12) - it does not infer. It is the governance of one, and therefore in MIC sandbox scope. resources/mappings.yaml traces every clause to its artefact and names the two gaps the model cannot close alone.
11 lines
410 B
JSON
11 lines
410 B
JSON
{
|
|
"_comment": "Withdrawal attempted on a ground not in the exhaustive 15.1 list. Must be refused before any credential is touched.",
|
|
"darbiba": "withdrawal",
|
|
"pamats": "we_felt_like_it",
|
|
"divasAtseviskasAmatpersonas": true,
|
|
"bridinajumaDienas": 45,
|
|
"noversanasPeriodsDots": true,
|
|
"parskatisanasDatumsNoteikts": false,
|
|
"_expected": { "lemumsPielaujams": false, "_rule": "W2_nezinams_pamats" }
|
|
}
|