You've already forked mi-apmainas-parvaldiba
Import UAPF package
64ecc3f48d
BPMN admission (AL0 -> AL2), four DMN decision tables and a CMMN case for suspension, withdrawal and appeal. The three rules that answer structural objections structurally: - 17.2 circularity is a precondition, not a warning (avota-neatkariba). A participant cannot be the source of its own admission evidence, including where it commercially supplies company-register data. - 15 adverse decisions fail closed: exhaustive grounds, 30-day notice, cure, 5-working-day emergency review, two distinct officers, conflict-free appeal. - 6.4 a legally significant answer is never T0. Not an AI system (Reg. (EU) 2024/1689 Art. 3(1), Recital 12) - it does not infer. It is the governance of one, and therefore in MIC sandbox scope. resources/mappings.yaml traces every clause to its artefact and names the two gaps the model cannot close alone.
12 lines
451 B
YAML
12 lines
451 B
YAML
kind: uapf.metadata.ownership
|
|
owners:
|
|
- type: org
|
|
id: pppa-lv
|
|
name: Publisko un privato partneribu asociacija (PPPA)
|
|
contact: info@pppa.lv
|
|
role: owner
|
|
approvers:
|
|
- pppa-lv
|
|
declared_interests:
|
|
- "Cyberfort SIA is both an editor of the Node Profile and a commercial implementer. This dual role is declared, not resolved (Node Profile 16, INTERESTS.md). Cyberfort MUST NOT sit on the appeal body for any node it implements (15.5)."
|