AI_Sandbox/mi-apmainas-parvaldiba
MCP Server
Active
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Exchange governance v0.1.0 - Node Profile v0.2 Part II as executable UAPF

Browse Source 
BPMN admission (AL0 -> AL2), four DMN decision tables and a CMMN case for
suspension, withdrawal and appeal.

The three rules that answer structural objections structurally:
- 17.2 circularity is a precondition, not a warning (avota-neatkariba). A
  participant cannot be the source of its own admission evidence, including
  where it commercially supplies company-register data.
- 15 adverse decisions fail closed: exhaustive grounds, 30-day notice, cure,
  5-working-day emergency review, two distinct officers, conflict-free appeal.
- 6.4 a legally significant answer is never T0.

Not an AI system (Reg. (EU) 2024/1689 Art. 3(1), Recital 12) - it does not
infer. It is the governance of one, and therefore in MIC sandbox scope.

resources/mappings.yaml traces every clause to its artefact and names the two
gaps the model cannot close alone.
This commit is contained in:
PPPA
2026-07-12 17:11:41 +00:00
commit 64ecc3f48d
24 changed files with 1118 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
metadata/ownership.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
kind: uapf.metadata.ownership
owners:
- type: org
id: pppa-lv
name: Publisko un privato partneribu asociacija (PPPA)
contact: info@pppa.lv
role: owner
approvers:
- pppa-lv
declared_interests:
- "Cyberfort SIA is both an editor of the Node Profile and a commercial implementer. This dual role is declared, not resolved (Node Profile 16, INTERESTS.md). Cyberfort MUST NOT sit on the appeal body for any node it implements (15.5)."